Melbourne teacher PETER LEE jailed for student sex


This Melbourne school teacher PETER LEE who committed the ultimate betrayal of trust a teacher can have with a student and her family will serve less than two measly friggin years for having sex with her within school grounds! Yes I am serious, no wonder they do this, the penalty is a minor inconvenience when you look at the big picture. Also what about the so-called friends places he took her to for sex? What sort of friends are they? Are they teachers?

This paedophile will get out and there is every chance he might be teaching at a TAFE or other educational venue near you when he gets out. If a man on the street rapes a poor woman he gets a lot longer than a few years.

So when it is a school teacher wouldn’t the great trust bestowed upon him that he has betrayed more of a crime. More punishable, a greater breach? What do you think readers?

By the way if anyone knows this teacher please email me a picture of him. He deserves prominent place in the story at the top of the page! I do feel for his family, what an embarrassment and a shame he must be…Not to mention the trauma the student and her family must be going through…

A MELBOURNE teacher who had sex with a 16-year-old female student on school grounds has been jailed.

Peter Lee, 41, had sex with the student in rooms at the Melbourne suburban high school, at his house, in his car and at houses of his friends, over a period of about nine months.

Months before his offending began Lee, a married father of two young children, gave a small amount of alcohol to the teenager at the school when she had personal problems, the County Court heard today.

The school suspended Lee for three days for supplying the alcohol to the student.

Judge Mark Dean said Lee groomed the teenager prior to his offending and had abused his position of trust.

“Your selfish conduct engaged in for your own physical and psychological gratification must be denounced by this court,” he said.

“I have no doubt our community would regard your offending as extremely serious.”

Judge Dean said Lee’s moral culpability was high.

But he said Lee was remorseful and his prospects of rehabilitation were positive.

The teenager expressed support for Lee in her victim impact statement. But her parents said the offending had damaged their family.

Lee, of Carlton, pleaded guilty to four counts of sexually penetrating a child aged 16 under his care, supervision or authority.

Judge Dean jailed Lee for three-and-a-half years and ordered he serve 21 months before being eligible for parole.

As Judge Dean completed his sentencing a young woman stormed out of court and swore in the direction of Lee and said he deserved a longer sentence.

Advertisements

67 thoughts on “Melbourne teacher PETER LEE jailed for student sex

  1. How can you say this man deserves more time than a rapist? A rapist cruely violates a person and forces them to engage in sexul activities against their will. Atleats sexual encounters with the student were consensual. Sure this was the ultimate breach of trust but only the trust of the parents, and it was not their decision to make.

    Like

  2. Anonymous, legally, at 16, she is not allowed to give consent, because she is not developmentally balanced, or mature enough to make an assessment considering the power imbalance (his over hers) etc.

    He can vote, drive, serve his country, marry, pay taxes, get a job, and much more.

    She can complete her school work, maybe sit for her p’s, and do her chores around the house. The power imbalance is why the law protects children (which is what she is) from making such decisions, to put the responsibility.

    He went too far, with a girl who was underage – Simple.

    Like

    • honeysmack, I agree with all that power inballance stuff but legally the age of consent in victoria is 16. And yes the law does say a person who is caring for you or supervising you, like a teacher, youth worker or foster carer, can’t have sex with you or sexually touch you or perform a sexual act in front of you, even if you agree but if she didn’t want it to happen it would have all come to an end at the first innapropriate encounter, whatever that may have been. I think you should take a leaf out of Aaron Fornarino’s book; she’s not stupid.

      Like

      • Of course she’s stupid. She’s 16! Everybody is when they’re 16. That’s why there are laws to protect them.

        Gullibility peaks around this age, especially about sex and relationships. She probably thought she was special and that they had a future and that his wife & kids would conveniently go away. Perhaps not her fault, but definitely stupid.

        Like

  3. – sorry! New Laptop! I’m still getting used to the keyboard.

    I meant to say, that it puts the responsibility back onto mature, developed adults to KEEP THEM SAFE, which
    he was employed to do, under a signed duty of care, and under moral obligations. He was paid to protect her, and instead, his dick won over his brain.

    He would have learned all about this stuff in his degree, and knew fully that he was breaking the law.

    He would have learned (as all teachers do) how to make Child Abuse Notifications and understood the grounds for making such notifications. All teachers are mandated to do so, to protect our little ones.

    Like

  4. Sorry Robbo, but the girl is 16yo. She’s not stupid. In Jewish law you were old enough if you were 12. Peter Lee is likely an Asian dude. This 16-year-old girl is a white, and she sure as hell ain’t that dumb.

    Or like they said about Miley Cyrus, “she’s yung, she’s dumb, then she’s old enough for cum”

    Like

    • Apart from your mind-numbing racism, what does religious custom of any sort have to do with this? We are (supposedly) a secular country with secular laws (for the most part) and these are what he breached.

      In addition, he betrayed the entire professional ethics structure of teaching.

      Like

  5. FYI! i actually know peter! i was there in court… im a close family friend and ex student. his not an evil man, he has fucked up big time but because i actually know him i’m willing to support him through this. I have nothing against the girl (who i cant name for obvious reasons). but i just urge people not to judge Pete when they dont know him personally

    Like

    • He has been judged and convicted, by the courts, by a group of his peers in the community. Some lines are never to be crossed and the teacher/student line is one of the biggest. When you have children maybe this will all make a lot more sense…All the best

      Like

  6. This honestly disgusts me how people can condemn Peter for one big mistake he has made in his life without actually giving the guy a fair go.
    Yes what he has done is wrong, yes what he did was a stupid lapse of judgement and yes he is now going to face the consequences of what he has done.

    As a former student and friend of his, the Peter I know was an amazing teacher who treated everyone with decency and respect, a man who hated to see people hurt and struggling, a man who many saw as a best friend and a great simple and down to earth guy.

    Peter has always been there for his friends and family and is now despised by people who don’t even know the whole story, by people who have read this biased trash of a news report and of an opinion that treats a man who made a mistake like a piece of crap.

    If people treated other half as well as Peter treated everyone you could truly understand what it felt to be happy and know that someone was there to support you even through the toughest of times.

    Like

    • How many times is a mistake? That is the question on peoples lips. A teacher is up there with priests in the trust and esteem they are held in by those that trust them. This is more than a mistake. Jails are full of people who make mistakes. If he were not known to you I am sure you may have a different opinion. Were you in court? have you read transcripts? Not all criminals are monsters, none the less they are still criminals…whether people like them or not

      Like

      • A mistake can be in an instant or can be a while.
        Yes I was in court supporting both Peter and the girl in question.
        Yes I agree that he has made a mistake and he is now being punished for it, I was just stating that Peter was a great guy like you said “Not all criminals are monsters, none the less they are still criminals…whether people like them or not” and that is true.

        I just wanted to share my opinion on the matter as I believe that although he has made a huge mistake it shouldn’t stain the fact that he was also a good person.

        Like

    • What would you say if it was your daughter, poor peter did it too, if you have one??????????????
      Forgive & forget????
      Bigmouth…….

      Like

  7. Hi Bec,

    I actually know him too, and he’s not evil you’re right. He’s a good person who has totally screwed up big time. It’s a reminder to me that good people do bad things too.

    Like

  8. Agree with the previous post too! Pete is well and truly paying for his mistake, and yes it was a big one. But he absolutely is a really kind and generous person. I have known him for years and one of my fondest memories is that he always made the effort to make sure everyone was happy, comfortable and made an effort to find common ground with everyone.
    I have never seen him be cruel or mean to anyone, and I think that all of you need to remember that he is paying for his crime and does not need all of you ignorant people to judge him too.

    Like

    • Do you think that approach is any different to the one cultivated by most paedos? Of COURSE he makes people feel comfortable & find common ground – it’d be a bit difficult for him to get access to children and the insides of their pants if he didn’t, wouldn’t it?

      These paedo supporters are just one facepalm moment after another, aren’t they? Sheesh!

      Like

      • How dare you call Peter a paedophile and that he is nice to people and finds common ground so he can do these things. He made a stupid stupid mistake with a girl who is of legal consent.

        Like

        • How dare? How dare your dear Peter has broken a sacred trust between teacher student parent school community wife kids family friends colleagues to say the very least…What you supporters do not seem to grasp is this man would of continued on his merry way if not caught…Maybe with you little cousin, maybe your sister, maybe with you, maybe with who knows…THERE lies the problem and the punishment…It is time all you immature supporters grew up fast.

          Because the next sicko could be grooming your child as we speak!

          If we cannot send our children to school and assume they are being educated rather than screwed by a teacher well then where are we all Cat, tell me?

          Take away the personal connection and come back and comment when you potentially find out your best cousin was betrayed by their teacher….

          Like

      • Cat – legally, he’s at least a sex offender. Do you prefer that term? She is NOT of legal age for him to have sex with. As I’ve said elsewhere, ONCE is a mistake, grooming and maintaining a relationship with her is a pattern of behavior. He was a TEACHER who is in his 40s. He absolutely would have known the law (not to mention the moral & social code) regarding what is considered an acceptable relationship between teacher and student. He chose to violate that with a girl who was under his care and control. The shoe labeled “predator” seems to fit fairly well…

        Like

  9. I’m with honeysmack, if this was a mistake – a stuff up – it took him several times to realise it? Yeah right.
    Sounds like this guy is a real groomer and shaker…

    Like

  10. Peter is a great man, he would never hurt anyone and would always be by your side no matter what you are going through, he is a loyal friend, and if he had of waited only one year or even resigned he would not be in jail this present moment. What he did was uncontrollable and his feelings were in the right place, however he is now being punished for it. I personally think that 3.5 years is a joke, he still has a family that supports him aswell as friends… and even in the article it says he has support from the girl.This was a crime purely out of feelings, there are bigger more heinous crimes that get less time then what he has recieved, this was a simple lapse in judgement that has caused both Peters family and the girls family hurt,which he is remourseful for.

    Like

    • You are so right PaulD, it is a joke, only 3.5 years. Because he does not appear to be a dirty old man hiding in the bushes preying on the kids means nothing, he did exactly the same thing as the creepy old stereotype. This was no one off “Moment” Of course she probably has feelings for him ,he made her feel wonderful, all part of the illusion, the lie….To all you supporters, if this was a male student how would you all feel then? BECAUSE THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE

      Like

    • Let me just point out to you and anyone else who isn’t clear on this…
      Yes the legal age to consent to sex in Victoria is 16 but this consent only lies between the ages of 16 and 18. If a person is over the age of 18 and has sex with anyone under the age of 18 it is counted as a sex crime! Clearly these laws are in place to stop vulnerable young girls from being preyed on. Unfortunately the justice system that is in place doesn’t do enough to stand by these laws as a young girl has had her childhood taken from her and all the predator responsible for it looses is 3 years of his life in jail. While he may have a wife and children the justice system would be doing his children a favor keeping him in there and away from them and as for his wife, she clearly hasn’t mattered to him for the last few years so why would she now??

      Like

  11. Once is a mistake. This many times is a pattern of behavior. All paedophiles have their delusional supporters. Regardless of her age, this guy as a teacher KNEW what he was doing was against the law. Make all the excuses you want, he deserves what he got – for breathtaking stupidity, if nothing else.

    Like

  12. As i know both Peter and the girl, and as i am a past student from the school, both of them are out there and lovable people, that were always together, I suspected something later last year, but didnt know to what extent there relationship was like ( thought it was just good friends), when i herd the news i was shocked but it was like I already knew, which was also the case with many of my friends. Both of them always had smiles on there face whenever they were together and were constantly laughing, i had a conversation with both of them once, which lead to my suspicion because they couldnt take there eyes of each other and had the biggest smiles, in our conversation the girl added a line saying something about Peter and he literally started to blush. All i can think about is what they were like last year and how happy they seemed to be, I do not know the girl well but i hope she is okay and well, but that is what i can remember of her and Peter in my last year of school. Peter is not a pedophile his emotions were clear he had fell for someone which he could never possible be with, and now is being punished with a whopping 3.5 years in jail.
    i agree with paul in the last post.
    3.5 years is shocking and i hope friends family and especially the girl are okay.
    By the way he isn’t asian…. hah!

    Like

  13. From the Victorian legal commission website:

    ” Sixteen to 17 years old
    A person who is caring for you or supervising you, like a teacher, youth worker or foster carer, can’t have sex with you or sexually touch you or perform a sexual act in front of you, even if you agree, unless they are married to you. However, it is not an offence if the person honestly believed you were 18 or older.”

    Note the line – EVEN IF YOU AGREE. He was aware of her age, he was aware of the law, he was aware of the potential consequences but he thought that all of these things didn’t matter because he wanted to cheat on his wife and family with some little bimbo. I have as much sympathy for him as I do for Andrew Chan. That is, none. You lot are a bunch of fools.

    “Great man” – HAH!

    Like

    • Hi Perp, a lot of his pupils are going to “Stick up for him” I guess in their eyes they still see the great guy that gave and gave…whatever….It will not be until they are older can they look back and see the big picture, rather than his personality at school. I said to one who wrote, maybe when you have kids of your own it will make more sense. Sad for those pupils that looked up to him…Those same kids should be thinking of his family

      Like

  14. ” he’s such a great guy, they were so cute together’ uh, he had a wife. Thought of her feelings? Or the shame and humilation to his kids that Dad couldn’t control his ‘crush?’

    He’s at fault, nice guy or not.

    Like

  15. And what about the girl? Doesn’t she deserve more, in the way of a relationship from someone who is available to her, and not his wife? or deserve someone who can support her more than 9-4, school hours?

    Don’t his kids deserve someone who isn’t going to tear family apart by making the choices he did?

    The girl in question is not the only victim here. Nice guy’s don’t do that, people.

    Teachers, okay, crushes happen. Acting on them is quite another story.

    Like

  16. For as long as I have known Peter he was always a bit of dickhead, but no-one ever thought it would come to this. Yes, the age of sexual consent is 16, but only if someone is within 2 years of your age and this excludes a teacher, social workers, fosters carers etc. If you are under 18 and someone is 2 years or more older than you, you can only give give sexual consent once you are 18 years of age. Once you over 18 years of age, you classified as fully legal and the age does not matter. If the girl was 18 years of age or over there would have been no problem, as they are both fully legal adults. If a male university lectutre has sex with a female student you never hear of it, as they are both over 18 and it is legal.

    Like

  17. At the end of the day whether if it was consensual or not?? He crossed the line.
    Peter Lee, 41, had sex with the student in rooms at the Melbourne suburban high school, at his house, in his car and at houses of his friends, over a period of about nine months.
    Months before his offending began Lee, a married father of two young children, gave a small amount of alcohol to the teenager at the school when she had personal problems, the Victorian County Court heard today.
    The school suspended Lee for three days for supplying the alcohol to the student.
    Well Planned & thought out??? Lee groomed the teenager prior to his offending and had abused his position of trust. The WORD being ABUSED HIS POSITION of trust..
    How would he feel if he has a daughter, this happened too her??
    AT the end of the day, his brain has disengaged, & his DICK has taken over!!! SIMPLE..
    The Girl Concerned may be no angel either!! Who Knows??
    Bigmouth…….

    Like

    • Angelic not, a student should be able to jiggle around naked in front of a teacher and the teacher’s ONLY appropriate response would be along the lines of “I’m leaving while you put your clothes back on”. Male or female.

      If this girl wasn’t his student, I wouldn’t particularly care. It would still be a bit off, but it wouldn’t infuriate me like this. It’s the undermining of every teacher’s reputation that has me really annoyed. That and his utter stupidity. I find willful stupidity very offensive.

      Like

      • WHAT……………
        A student should be able too jiggle around naked in front of the Teacher..
        What are you smokin..
        If that happened , YES THE TEACHER MALE OR FEMALE response should of been to go & get A FEMALE OR MALE TEACHER TO DEAL WITH THAT PARTICULAR FEMALE OR MALE STUDENT…..
        And to say if the student wasn’t his student, ID MYSELF WOULD BE CONCERNED FOR THAT FEMALES SAFETY………. Jingling around naked ………Angel or no bloody Angel……………………….

        Like

      • Given that you don’t seem to be able to grasp my point, I’ll try wording it more simply for you – it doesn’t matter WHAT the student does, there is no excuse for a teacher taking advantage of it. I’m not saying that a student *should* jiggle around naked, I’m saying that even if they did, all a teacher should do is leave/reject the student’s proposition.

        Is that easier for you to understand? I hope so…

        Like

      • Perplexed
        Ah have I Read what you wrote right??? Your wording says!!!
        QUOTE……
        A STUDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO JIGGLE AROUND NAKED IN FRONT OF THE TEACHER..
        Or is it in another language???
        Bigmouth………

        Like

      • And that’s what we call “taking something out of context”. Try reading the whole sentence. You’re not really that thick, are you? The sentence indicates that no matter what a student does, there is no excuse for a teacher to take advantage of said student. If you don’t understand that concept, then I can’t help you. Maybe you could get someone to explain it to you, it’s a pretty simple idea…

        Do you finally get it now?

        Like

  18. Why on earth do people think he has made a mistake.That is NO mistake it’s a VIOLATION of his duty of care.It disgusts me to no end that people are willing to stick up for a sick individual who has not only used his job to precure sex from a student but he is also married.A mistake is when you buy the wrong soze in clothing not having sex with a student and claiming it was ok.It is far from ok and he should be punished accordingly.If any of you are parents please enlighten me to how you would feel if it was your child be it a son or daughter.If this is how society is going I am sickend.

    Like

    • Here, here Goth. I am married and a parent of a young child, it sickens me that this sh*t happens. He is a married man. He is a teacher. He is an adult. Three strikes – he’s done.

      Like

    • To be honest, Goth, I think they’re kiddies from his classes. Past or present.

      Have you heard of cognitive dissonance? Interesting stuff. I think it may be the case here. They know/knew him and like/d him and now he’s committed an act that violates our social moral code. In order to not feel negatively about themselves (foolish, gullible, etc) they are compelled to highlight aspects of his character that are socially desirable to validate (to themselves) their own positive feelings toward him.

      That’s the thumbnail sketch psychobabble explanation, anyway.

      Like

  19. I like your way of thinking Perplexed! And yes, I agree with the Cognitive Dissonance theory.

    I also noted in a media article that a young woman in court ran away, angry at the measly sentence, saying that he should have got more. Whether that’s true or not, who knows.

    This tells me that perhaps Peter Lee didn’t stop at one girl…I’ll be curious to see if others come out of the woodwork. Given his deluded fans I wouldn’t be surprised.

    And you know what else is scary? Jury. Jury is created by members of the public to represent public view.

    It’s frightening after reading comments here that any citizen could become a member of the jury and let crimes like these walk because of their own lack of education or socialization on the matter.

    Cheers!

    Like

    • FYI there is no jurie if he pleaded guilty in his indictable offences hearing, which he did as there was too much offence against him. So there is a only a judge to decide the length of the sentence

      Like

      • Try re-reading the post. Honeysmack is not saying that there was a jury in this case. What is being said is that it’s disturbing that people as gullible as the ones defending this paedo in this forum may be called up for jury duty.

        Like

  20. Just to the few posts above, he has difinately violated his authority, trust, duty of care, etc. I am with the people who say it is NOT a mistake. In all sense how can it be a mistake, if he was grooming her to consent to it? No more needs to be said

    Like

  21. Reading through these posts, it is worth noting that those that have been written by people who know the girl, or know Peter, or who have sat though the court case (ie. those that are informed) are all messages of support – for Peter, his family, and also the girl. It is clear from these messages that Peter is a good person, obviously held in high regard by many students, who made a terrible mistake for which he is now paying.

    Those that have been written by people who have acquired their facts only from the media are ill-informed and unhelpful. Robbo – what gives you the right to pass judgment on people who have already been tried and punished by our justice system? And Perplexed – Cat is right – it is incorrect to refer to someone as a pedophile for having had sex with a 16 year old. Pedophilia is a clinical term which refers to individuals who are attracted to prepubescent children. You should get your fact straight before stating them online.

    It seems likely that in this case the lengthy duration of sentence was chosen for its deterrence, as it is crucial that in our society teachers uphold their positions of responsibility and protection and that our trust in them is maintained. It is unfortunate for Peter and his family that the cost of this deterrence is a prison sentence perhaps longer, given the circumstances, than is required for his punishment and rehabilitation.

    Those wishing to pass judgment on cases they know little about should spare a thought for how wrong their words can be, and the impact that these words can have.

    Like

    • As I started in my reply earlier, I’m just as content for the terms sex offender or predator to be used instead of paedophile, although if you want to talk facts, you might want to consider the fact that, while the DSM-IV differentiates between paedophilia and hebephilia, the draft of the DSM-V is recommending that the two be combined and renamed paedohebephilic disorder. In addition to this, it is widely accepted that the common use term also applies to sexual contact with adolescent minors. You are obviously another one of this person’s apologists who is willing to ignore the calculated grooming of a child, the betrayal of his profession and family and the incredible arrogance he displayed in continuing an obviously inappropriate a relationship with a child.

      Like

      • Sorry – hit send instead of enter.

        To continue –

        You say that people should consider the impact of their words. I think you should take your own advice, as what you have written here implies tacit approval of the actions of a sexual predator who beached multiple codes, professional and ethical.

        Like

    • This reply (in case it gets lost in the order here re numerous anonymous posters) is to Anonymous June 124 2011 at 1.00am. First words “reading through these posts…
      Ok here I go

      I do not give 2 shits about how great this dickhead is. But you, I imagine, are an unfortunate soul who has been sucked in by this dirty sick man purely by some association. But to quote you, what gives me the right etc etc.
      Well I have every right to comment on anything I choose, I also have the right to pass judgement on a convicted criminal. I also have the right to reply to people like you who are blinded by one of a few things, one which seems the immaturity to grasp the entire situation here. But mostly that you fail in the simplest terms to even acknowledge anyone could dare to speak about this, because we do not know him personally. That is what makes my blood boil (and others I bet)
      Because maybe I, and others, are victims of this type of abuse, maybe, just maybe we speak from experience, maybe we have experience in knowing that this type of thing happens over and over when they are not caught out…
      I feel very sad for you for so many reasons. But finally probably because you chose to stay anonymous and NOT stand by what you have to say.
      See my name is on this post, My picture too, in fact it is on this blog, because I own it, and stand by everything i say on here, and post on here…
      Maybe one day you will feel strongly enough about things in your life, to take a stand, and make a difference in if only one person’s life.

      Like

  22. Perplexed, thank you so much for your input.It is spot on.I am sick to death of people aplitting hairs over this particular case.Peter Lee abused his privilige as a teacher.I do not care how old the student in question was or is.He used his position of trust and had sex with a student.It is wrong and those who think otherwise must be short of morals.

    Like

  23. Well I’m over this peter lee story..
    Goes on all the time, all over the place Id say..
    He got caught..
    But she didn’t cry rape????
    But he crossed the line……….
    Peter enjoy your holiday, & hope you find Christ, like they all do????????????
    The End……
    Bigmouth…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

    Like

  24. I know them both very well, and I’m going to continue supporting this endlessly.
    They have both made a mistake, and they should have waited. But they didn’t. Now they are going to suffer the consequences. But it’s done, and this matter has been dealt with.
    He is going to jail for 3.5 years and that is punishment enough. there is no reason to keep going on about this… its only going to cause more hurt for both families.

    Like

    • i don’t think anyone is disputing it was totally wrong what he did.
      just some people are convinced he is a sex offender and some saying he made a stupid mistake and should have waited.
      King – do you know if they are still together, or planning to be? rightly or wrongly there are obviously some feelings there

      Like

  25. He is 40 and a teacher (was one now) what was he thinking! If he is a nice person and have some dignity should able to said NO and consider it would be inappropriate and unethical to have a relationship/ sex with a 16 years old let alone one of his student. Why all these supporters defending Peter Lee??? how about his wife and his children the true victims here

    Like

  26. To Anonymous of June 24th,

    Remember ACTION SPEAKS LOUDER than WORDS…..Due to his action now Peter Lee is a despicable man

    Like

  27. To Anonymous,
    I bet you are a teenager or probably a close friend of the girl that is why you able to make such statement “Sure this was the ultimate breach of trust but only the trust of the parents, and it was not their decision to make.” This is not a f##king forbiden love story, this is real world! The parents have every single right to say and decide if the child is still living under their care and besides the point the parents paid the school fee hence they indirectly paid for Peter Lee to do his job as an educator. The parents decide she went to Thornbury to get a better education not to have sex with someone almost as old as her own father!!!

    Like

  28. Hi guys, I’m actually commenting from England in the UK, reading this story it is discusting, but in the UK 16 is the legal age so I guess the girl can make her own decisions on who she has sex with, but this 41year old married “father” should not have taken advantage, and abused his trust.over in England he would get atleast 13yrs imprisonment, as a teacher who had a sexualy relationship with 2! 15yr old students, over in the UK there is a lot of sex crime there is people raping babies over here! And let me tell you, he should be forced to sign the sex offenders register when he gets our of prison, although I’m sure at the time he didn’t see the wrongness in what he did, and I bet he regrest what he did like crazy, but does it really take imprisonment for him to realise that he did take advantage of a vulnerable school girl! Although he is paying the price its trulky horrific and I’m sure he would be livid it this was his daughter!

    Like

  29. I knew Peter, I am an ex student. He was a drugged up, un predicable, always twitching man, who did infact offer me various times to buy weed, ecstasy and pretty much handed around a bottle to our class of straight vodka to drink. He deserves his sentence, knew it would come and get him someday, pretty much bound for the slammer.

    Like

Post your thoughts here, then PRESS POST COMMENT button folks, cheers

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s