GERARD BADEN-CLAY HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY MURDERING HIS WIFE, SENTENCED TO LIFE IN PRISON
I will post the Victim Impact Statements in full as soon as I can
I have included them in the GBC MENU or feel free to access each family members page and make a comment here
The gutless cowardly pathetic serial adulterer and excuse of a husband, father, businessman and community member, may each day be long and night lonelier, like Allison, whom you killed and left lifeless to rot in the forest!
DECISION NOW DUE 11.45AM
Verdict due 11.45 am today
Please NOTE This Community is too important to let any individual ruin it for others!
From now on, bullying in any form will result in ONE WARNING FROM ME (ROBBO) and 2nd time will result in an instant ban from the site.
We are here to discuss important things, not to make personal attacks. Admin (ROBBO) will be the one who determines whether or not a message is deemed as bullying or inappropriate. Thank you for your cooperation
(Robbo, owner and operator of aussiecriminals)
Tweets by @TheMurrayD
Gerard Baden-Clay given life sentence for murder of wife Allison
Former Brisbane real estate agent Gerard Baden-Clay has been given a life sentence after being found guilty of murdering his wife Allison in April 2012.
A Supreme Court jury has convicted the 43-year-old of killing the mother-of-three at their Brookfield home and disposing of her body under the Kholo Creek Bridge, more than 13 kilometres away.
Allison’s family shouted “yes” as the verdict was read out, while security asked for a short break because Baden-Clay was struggling to breathe.
Baden-Clay, who had protested his innocence in the witness box, faces a non-parole period of 15 years.
In a victim impact statement read to the court, Allison’s mother, Priscilla Dickie, said Baden-Clay had “betrayed” her daughter.
“We have all been robbed of Allison’s love,” she said. “The discovery of our darling daughter was absolutely devastating.
“The tragedy of it all is she had so much to offer.”
Allison’s father Geoff Dickie told the court he had been left “devastated by the murder of my precious, gifted and talented daughter”.
It was a case about sex, lies and murder that gripped the city of Brisbane for two years, and the ever-growing queues outside the Supreme Court were a testament to the public’s fascination with the sordid story.
In life, Allison Baden-Clay was a dancer, teacher, successful career woman, devoted wife and mother of three girls.
In death, she became well-known for all the wrong reasons.
Her disappearance in 2012 shocked the tight-knit affluent community of Brookfield. Well-wishers and concerned residents laid flowers at her home, not knowing what else to do.
At the same time, hundreds of police and State Emergency Service (SES) volunteers swung into action, combing surrounding suburbs for any trace of the missing woman.
“Please help us, because there are three beautiful little girls of Allison’s wanting to see their mother,” her father had pleaded.
Her mother urged: “Our lives will never be the same – we must, must find her – she’s so precious.”
Premier vowed resources to find Allison
Queensland Premier Campbell Newman vowed to commit whatever resources were necessary to finding her.
“I’m just very sad for the family and friends. It’s obviously just incredibly distressing,” he said at the time.
However, from the moment Baden-Clay reported his wife missing on April 20, 2012, police knew this was no ordinary missing persons case.
He had told them she went for an early morning walk and never returned home.
But marks on his face alerted police that something more sinister may have happened.
Hours turned into days, and on April 30 a lone kayaker discovered what was later confirmed as Allison’s body on the muddy banks of Kholo Creek at Anstead, about 10 kilometres from the family’s home.
That day, police refused to say whether Baden-Clay was a suspect.
On June 13, however, he was arrested and charged with his wife’s murder.
Crown case against Baden-Clay circumstantial
By its own admission, the crown’s case against Baden-Clay was a circumstantial one, but the accumulation of evidence was powerful.
A post-mortem examination failed to determine a cause of death due to decomposition, and apart from a chipped tooth and possible bruising, there were no fractures to Allison’s body.
But forensic pathologist Dr Nathan Milne believed Allison did not die from natural causes.
The crown said she died at the hands of her husband, the last person to see her alive.
At the time of her disappearance, Baden-Clay had marks on his face and body that drew the attention of police.
He had excuses for them, though: he had cut himself shaving in a rush; the marks on his neck were where he had crushed a caterpillar that had landed on him while he was watching one of his daughters compete in a cross-country race; and marks on his hand were from a screwdriver that slipped while he was helping renovate a friend’s house, but marks on his chest and shoulder could not be explained by him.
However, three forensic experts testified that marks on Baden-Clay’s face were likely fingernail scratches and Baden-Clay’s claim that they were from a razor was simply implausible.
They said marks on Baden-Clay’s body could also be from scratching, although they were less conclusive.
Then there was the dripping blood found in the boot of Allison’s four-wheel drive. DNA testing confirmed it was Allison’s.
Baden-Clay’s double life
The murder trial exposed a couple living very different lives publicly and in private.
On the face of it, the Baden-Clays were a successful family, running their own prestige real estate company.
But they were in deep financial trouble and Baden-Clay was having trouble paying off loans to friends.
In desperation, he had begged the state Member for Moggill, Dr Bruce Flegg, for a loan of up to $400,000, fearing he would go bankrupt without it.
Baden-Clay was also caught between two women: his wife and lover.
In marriage counselling, Baden-Clay had professed to want a future with Allison, but at the same time was vowing to leave his wife on her birthday for former employee Toni McHugh.
An email trail between Ms McHugh and a secret account set up by Baden-Clay under the name Bruce Overland portrayed a tumultuous affair, and growing frustrations from Ms McHugh about her lover’s unfulfilled promises.
“Well you’ll have to forgive me that I feel disappointed when this happens. I’m sick of hiding,” Ms McHugh wrote on February 20, 2012.
“I’m sick of being second best and having to take the back seat … all so she doesn’t find out.
“Why should I believe things are going to be any different than the past[?]”
Ms McHugh wrote on March 27 she had looked at rental properties.
“It would be so much easier if you did just move in with me,” she said.
“She can get her own place and the week you have the children you move back to the house.”
I’m sick of being second best and having to take the back seat – all so she doesn’t find out.Toni McHugh in an email to Baden-Clay
Baden-Clay wrote on April 3: “I have given you a commitment and I intend to stick to it – I will be separated by 1 July.”
He also wrote an email on April 11 – referring to Ms McHugh as GG – their names for each other were Gorgeous Girl and Gorgeous Boy.
“This is agony for me too. I love you,” he said.
“I’m sorry you hung up on me. It sounded like you were getting very angry. I love you GG. Leave things to me now. I love you. GB.”
Until April 2012, Baden-Clay had been able to keep his two worlds separate, but they were about to collide spectacularly.
On April 20, Allison and Ms McHugh were due to attend the same real estate conference.
In the witness box, Baden-Clay passed off his declarations of love to Ms McHugh as empty promises to appease a volatile, unstable and confrontational woman who was infatuated with him.
He portrayed himself as a philanderer, but no murderer: he had affairs with numerous women, but was never going to leave his wife.
Baden-Clay admitted he deceived Allison, Ms McHugh, his family and friends, and in return for his deception they gave him their loyalty.
“My intention was to end any relationship with Toni McHugh and solidify and continue my relationship with Allison for our future together,” he said in the witness box.
But the crown submitted Baden-Clay and Ms McHugh were very much entwined and his deceptive conduct showed what he was capable of.
Allison’s mental health raised at trial
The jury saw two faces of Allison. The defence painted a picture of a woman plagued by depression and unable to cope with the pressures of life.
They pursued the possibility that Allison could have taken her own life or wandered off into the night to her death.
According to testimony from Baden-Clay’s father, Nigel, and sister Olivia Baden-Walton, Allison was so incapacitated she could not get off the couch.
But her friends and family told a different story: she was a woman who was happy and feeling positive before she disappeared.
A GP, two psychologists and a psychiatrist who had treated Allison all said she was not a suicide risk.
Marriage counsellor Carmel Ritchie, who consulted with the couple just days before her death, also testified that Allison was hopeful for her future and wanting to make her marriage work.
One thing was clear, however: their marriage was in crisis. Allison’s journal revealed a woman tormented by self-doubt.
“I don’t want to be alone,” she wrote.
“I am afraid of being alone and lonely, maybe because I think I can’t handle it. I am afraid of failing – failing in my marriage and what people will think.”
Allison also had lingering questions about her husband’s affair with Ms McHugh. Some were answered, some were not.
Questions like how many times did they go to the movies together? How did they pay for hotels? Where did they have sex in her apartment? Sex in the family car?
“Did she ever say: ‘I feel bad because you’re married?'”
Three daughters left behind
The trial was the first time the public had heard the three Baden-Clay children speak about their mother’s disappearance.
Heartbreaking video recordings of police interviews with the girls, then aged 10, eight and five, taken on the afternoon their mother was reported missing showed their fear, distress and confusion at what was happening around them.
Baden-Clay wiped away tears while watching his daughters sob as they were quizzed by detectives.
Each described being put to bed by their parents. The middle girl remembered her mother singing Away In A Manger to her.
“Dad said mum had gone for a walk,” the eight-year-old said.
The youngest child said: “She was walking for a long time and we think she twisted her ankle.
“I didn’t get to see her at all because I was fast asleep.”
The eldest recalled seeing her mum on the couch watching TV when she got up to get a glass of water.
“Dad was trying to keep calm for us, but I don’t actually know what was going on in his head,” she said.
She saw “scratches” on her dad’s face, but none of the girls heard anything during the night.
The families and supporters of the Baden-Clays have sat through each day of the trial listening to evidence almost too painful to bear.
They are bound by grief, but divided by loyalty.
The guilty verdict gives them an answer – wanted or not.
But one question remains, and only Baden-Clay can really answer how he murdered his wife.
Amidst the murky personal drama are three little girls who lost their mother and will now have to learn to live without their father.
“content kindly supplied by Brisbane Times”
Gerard Baden-Clay trial: Three days of deliberations and no verdict yet
The jury considering the fate of accused wife killer Gerard Baden-Clay is yet to reach a verdict after a third day of deliberations.
The seven men and five women of the jury returned to the courtroom briefly on Monday after requesting Justice John Byrne explain the nature of circumstantial evidence for the second time.
One juror sent a note to Justice Byrne requesting “another reading of the process and meaning and application of circumstantial evidence to arrive at a verdict”.
Justice Byrne re-read part of his summing up to the jury relating to circumstantial evidence.
“It is not necessary that facts be proved by direct evidence. They may be proved by circumstantial evidence alone, or by a combination of direct and circumstantial,” he said.
“So you should consider all the evidence, including circumstantial evidence.
“Importantly, to bring in a verdict of guilty based entirely, or substantially, on circumstantial evidence, guilt should not only be a rational inference, it must be the only rational inference that could be drawn from the circumstances.
“If there is any reasonable possibility consistent with innocence, it is your duty to find the accused not guilty.”
One juror lingered in the courtroom re-reading Justice Byrne’s summation which was displayed on a large screen, as the other jurors rose from their seats to return to the deliberation room.
The jury retired to consider its verdict at 11.10am on Thursday after hearing from 72 witnesses, including Mr Baden-Clay, and watching video recordings of police interviews with the Baden-Clays’ three young daughters.
Their deliberations were interrupted four times last week after it was revealed one juror accessed information on the internet and another juror requested the judge explain how the jury should view alleged lies told by Mr Baden-Clay.
The high-profile murder trial will enter its 21st day when the jury resumes its deliberations on Tuesday.
He has pleaded not guilty.
All previous threads and history including trial can be found clicking on link below http://aussiecriminals.com.au/category/gerard-baden-clay/
ANY EVIDENCE LIKE PHOTOS, VIDEO OR DOCUMENTS THE COURT RELEASES TO THE PUBLIC WILL BE PUBLISHED in the GBC Documents Page